9/11 Court Case in Horsham Tomorrow [Today]: Tony’s Plea to Activists To Reinvestigate 9/11 main list – (Before It’s News)

(Before It’s News)

http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-ground-zero/2013/02/911-court-case-in-horsham-tomorrow-tonys-plea-to-activists-to-reinvestigate-911-main-list-2439588.html

BBC – COLLUDING WITH TERRORISM? REINVESTIGATE 911 MAIN LIST

PhotobucketFrom Frank A.Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 08:12:43 -0800
From: honkystar@yahoo.com

Subject: Fw: 9/11 Court Case in Horsham Tomorrow: Tony’s Plea to Activists To Reinvestigate 9/11 main list Saturday 23 February

Tony Rooke has persuaded the courts that the BBC must answer the allegation that, in covering up information on the 9/11 attacks, they are colluding with terrorism. Many truth activists are planning to attend the three hour hearing in front of a judge at Horsham magistrates court this Monday 25 February at 9.00am.

There are only 30 seats available in the court room and they will be on a first come first serve basis. Some activists will be flying long distance. The hearing will be at The Law Courts, Hurst Road, Horsham West Sussex England RH12 2ET. At least one mainstream media crew will be present but Tony is asking activists not to talk to them and not to hold up placards which do not represent his views.

Please go to bottom to see his message in full. The message to the mainstream media is that Tony will be making a statement after the hearing and they should wait for that. Campaigners are concerned that the media will seek out and interview whoever they can find pedalling a radical 9/11 theory and use them to attempt to discredit months of hard work. This has been a common tactic, for instance from the BBC in their Conspiracy Files programmes. To prevent this happening, organisers intend to physically obstruct interviews with mainstream media outside the court if necessary. Activists attending the hearing are asked to make sure any signs represent the message of this campaign: that the BBC has covered up the truth on 9/11.

Those with signs saying anything that would appear speculative to a general audience (eg 9/11 was an inside job) will be seen as undermining the court case and Tony’s campaign. On the factual side Tony is most concerned to highlight the symmetrical collapse of WTC Building 7, a large portion of which fell at free fall speed and which was announced by the BBC some half hour before it happened. He says the Jimmy Saville scandal shows that the BBC were unable to investigate a child molester in their midst, so it is hardly surprising that they do not have the courage to impartially investigate the crime of the century. ‘Despite recent offers from mainstream sources, Tony Rooke and his defence team feel that this has come all too late and is not consistent with far too many years of indifference towards the scientific facts that incontrovertibly disprove the official account of 9/11.

Illegal wars have come and continue to be fought under the pretext of that day. Civil liberties have been erased along with the countless lives of troops, civilians and children abroad. These overtures of ‘friendly’ interest are not to be trusted. This court case has happened only BECAUSE of mainstream media’s indifference, antipathy and often ridicule towards those who have researched and found the truth of 9/11, in tandem with a conspicuous silence in the face of such overwhelming evidence that disproves the official version. The mainstream press are to be treated with the contempt they deserve. This case is being fought by those whose ONLY interest is in seeing the science of the 9/11 event analysed by a court, a scrutiny of FACTS that SHOULD have been undertaken by the commercial press and the BBC a long time ago.

Any individual who engages in conversation with a demonstrably deceptive mainstream media at Horsham, does NOT speak for myself or the defence team and we disassociate ourselves from those who cannot resist such insincere overtures. Win, lose or draw, we hope that this court case prompts all those who mistrust our media, to engage in similar, peaceful action, until such numbers become impossible to ignore.

The time for ‘research’ is long over. The obvious suspects, complicit in the orchestration and cover-up of 9/11, now need to be questioned by uncorrupted police officers. This will NOT be achieved sat in front of your PC. Ignore ITN, ignore ANY mainstream journalist. They have earned your suspicion.’ Thank you to all who have supported this stand for progress.

Tony Rooke for colluding wioth terrorism Reinvestigate 9/11

www.reinvestigate911.org
info@reinvestigate911.org

http://www.youtube.com/user/reinvestigate911org

We will support any new investigation of the 9/11 attacks so long as *it is run by uncompromised people with a range of opinion including those inclined to disbelieve the official 9/11 story, *it follows the evidence wherever it leads if it takes place in the US to be credible it will need *full legal authority to demand immediate access to any evidence and any witness it chooses *the resources it requires to carry out its investigation Reinvestigate 911 is supported by Coffee Plant ( www.coffee.uk.com) suppliers of organic and Fairtrade coffees to caterers and retail customers.

_______________________________________________

Reinvestigate911-l mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/reinvestigate911-l

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to 9/11 Court Case in Horsham Tomorrow [Today]: Tony’s Plea to Activists To Reinvestigate 9/11 main list – (Before It’s News)

  1. Pingback: [UK-911-Truth] 9/11 Insider Trading – Alex Brown Bank – Sheila C. |

  2. Pingback: VIDEO: Tony Rooke after his 9/11 court case |

  3. Pingback: Tony Rooke has persuaded the courts that the BBC must answer the allegation that, in covering up information on the 9/11 attacks, they are colluding with terrorism – |

  4. Pingback: 9/11 Court Case in Horsham Today: BBC Must Answer Allegation Regarding the Covering up of Information |

  5. Pingback: Was the BBC’s reporting of the science of World Trade Centre 7 accurate? – Truthloader |

  6. Pingback: 9/11 controversy in Horsham court – West Sussex County Times – Paul B. |

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Add video comment