By Rixon Stewart on February 6, 2011
News Commentary – February 6, 2011
British Prime Minister David Cameron has criticized “multiculturalism” in a speech that cited it as a factor promoting “radicalisation” within society.
Significantly Cameron’s speech marked a growing polarisation within the West as it signals a tougher stance on groups promoting “Islamic extremism”.
As a mentor once told this writer however, “there is no such thing as coincidence”, and the fact that German Chancellor Angela Merkel was saying exactly the same thing only months earlier should ring alarm bells.
Just as its no coincidence that adverts featuring multicultural, multiracial casts have proliferated worldwide in recent years.
So why did David Cameron’s pronouncement on multiculturalism echo Chancellor Angela Merkel late last year, when she said that it has “failed utterly” in Germany.
Are they reading from the same script and following the same – hidden – agenda?
We shouldn’t forget earlier warnings when waves of immigrants from different cultures and races first began to flood into Europe. At the time the corporate media almost unanimously labelled those who voiced misgivings about the influx as “prejudiced”.
So were they? Or has “multiculturalism” really failed?
Or more to the point, should we be asking ourselves if it wasn’t meant to fail right from the outset?
At the risk of repetition I have return to one of the most important documents in recent centuries because it has a direct bearing on this.
In 1871 Albert Pike, one of the leading Freemason’s of his day wrote about events that were yet to unfold.
In a letter to Giuseppe Mazzini, one of the founders of modern Italy and it is alleged the Mafia, Pike wrote about the coming “World Wars”. In the letter, dated August 15, 1871, Pike claimed he had been informed by a “spirit guide” that:
“The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the “agentur” (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.”
This is in fact exactly what happened little more than fifty years later and more was to follow: in fact a Second World War was predicted.
“The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.”
Again, even the casual student of history will know that this is precisely what happened. Unfortunately, it didn’t end there:
“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.”
This is exactly what is beginning to happen today with the so-called “War on Terror” and rising tensions between Israel and Iran and its allies. Could it be that the pronouncements of both Cameron and Merkel were only intended to add fuel to the fire?
That isn’t so outrageous as it may sound. After years of relentlessly promoting “multiculturalism” – where anyone who didn’t support the ethic was denounced as the modern day equivalent of a heretic, a “racist” – we are now being told that it is one of the contributory factors behind much of modern terror.
This sudden turnaround seems like another example of a manipulative old ruse; wherein the elite owned media and politicians set people up only to knock them down.
Pike continues in his letter:
“Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…”
Can we take this to mean that communities were intended to be fractured through mass immigration, transforming formerly homogeneous societies into potentially volatile mixes with the influx various races and faiths. Thereby rendering them all the more vulnerable to the principle of “divide and rule”?
This is certainly what we’ve seen in the West in recent years and it also explains Merkel and Cameron’s near identical statements. After years of tacitly encouraging mass immigration – wherein the principle of “multiculturalism” has been subtly and relentlessly promoted at every level – we are now being told that it is a contributory factor to terror.
Although Cameron’s statements might be seen as endorsing the stand of more extreme groups like the British National Party they are in their own way just as duplicitous.
For we have it on good authority that Nick Griffin, leader of the British National Party, is working for British Intelligence. This may explain rumours about him being gay – and thereby open to blackmail and manipulation – and explain why all recent legal actions against him have come to nought.
In short Griffin is paid for and protected by the establishment to do their dirty work. As are Cameron and Merkel and while all three may profess different views, by hook or by crook they are all leading us down the same dark and dangerous path.
- The Delusion of David Cameron (exile.wordpress.com)
- David Cameron: “State multiculturalism” has failed (shortformblog.com)