Flight MH 370: Is there a sinister link with “Captain Phillips” “Maersk Alabama”? – Tim Veater

Flight MH 370: Is there a sinister link with “Captain Phillips'”  “Maersk

Alabama”?

 

Hollywood Comes to KUALA LUMPUR

 

Others on this web site have highlighted the many contradictions and confusions

surrounding this incident. The initial crash into the sea north east of Malaysia

has very belated morphed into no crash at all with a dramatically changed flight

path in the opposite direction. The communication signals and tracking, far from

loosing the plane at about 8.11 am local time Sat 8th March 2014, has increased

in phases to reveal by virtue of radar, both civil and military, satellite

tracking and the automated Boeing/Rolls Royce engine and flight monitoring, that

there was no doubt of the height, direction or mechanical status of the plane

for at least five hours after its “disappearance” had been reported. Based on

this and the fact that the Indian Ocean is meticulously monitored by US advanced

radar and satellite systems, not to mention naval and air force assets of

several nations permanently on patrol in the area, there can be no doubt the

flight and fate of this aircraft is kno

wn at least in Washington and probably else where. The report that the US has

refused to divulge its tracking information is possibly rather indicative of the

plane’s destination and fate.

 

The world is being asked to believe the literally INCREDIBLE story that a

combination of civil and military radar tracking cannot spot aircraft on

unscheduled flight paths. If so all inhabitants of all countries should adopt a

fatalistic approach to attack and ask for their taxes in back for the billions

spent on such to provide “security” from air attack. How the American nation

(two billion humans!) could swallow the trash of 9/11 and even promote the

controllers of it, demonstrates only the mass stupidity of human kind and the

total failure of so-called democratic systems of accountability. It proved, if

proof were needed, that government can literally do ANYTHING, say ANYTHING,

however ludicrous and get away with it. The old saying of the bigger the lie

etc.

 

From this several distinct “phases” can be identified:

 

* The first when normal communication was maintained by pilot and transponder

until both ceased;

* The second as it was plotted by civil and military radar for perhaps an hour

after “disappearing”

* the third for perhaps a further three or four hours tracked by at least

Malaysian and other nation states’ MILITARY radar

* a further period, probably until aircraft crashed or landed identified by

satellite AND more importantly by Boeing/RollsRoyce in relation to automatic

engine/flight data which overlooked may have given the game away.

 

All these phases  must have been known by the Malaysian authorities from the

beginning. It proves a certain level of deception for what ever reason known

only to them.

 

However there is another interpretation demonstrated here: withit. See:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNZtz-HVy6c

If this representation of the radar information can be trusted, a completely

different scenario exists in which two different locations for the disappearance

of the plane are suggested and neither of them incorporating an almost 180

degree turn. In this the plane disappears where originally suggested or

alternatively  off the coast of Vietnam where it vanishes off screen and a

stalking aircraft with it. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNZtz-HVy6c

 

Russian/Chinese sources on the other hand are circulating a dramatic and

worrying interpretation that may be found in full here:

 

http://www.eutimes.net/2014/03/malaysia-airlines-mystery-deepens-after-top-disease-experts-rushed-to-indian-ocean/

 

and here: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1753.htm

 

I quote: “According to this report, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (also marketed

as China Southern Airlines flight 748 through a codeshare) was a scheduled

passenger flight from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing, China, when on 8 March

this Boeing 777-200ER aircraft “disappeared” in flight with 227 passengers on

board from 15 countries, most of whom were Chinese, and 12 crew members.

 

“As we had previously noted in our report “Russia “Puzzled” Over Malaysia

Airlines “Capture” By US Navy,” the GRU had previously notified China’s Ministry

of State Security (MSS) of its suspicions regarding this flight due its

containing a “highly suspicious” cargo that had been offloaded in the Republic

of Seychelles from the US-flagged container ship MV Maersk Alabama.

 

“First arousing the GRU’s concerns regarding this “highly suspicious” cargo,

this report continues, was that after its unloading from the MV Maersk Alabama

on 17 February, its then transfer to Seychelles International Airport where it

was loaded on an Emirates flight bound for Kuala Lumpur International Airport in

Malaysia, after first stopping over in Dubai, the two highly trained US Navy

SEALS who were guarding it were found dead.

 

“The two US Navy SEALS protecting this “highly suspicious” cargo, Mark Daniel

Kennedy, 43, and Jeffrey Keith Reynolds, 44, were found dead under “suspicious

circumstances” aboard the MV Maersk Alabama, this report says, further raising

Russian intelligence suspicions as they were both employed by the Virginia

Beach, Virginia-based maritime security firm The Trident Group which was founded

by US Navy Special Operations Personnel (SEAL’s) and Senior US Naval Surface

Warfare Officers and has long been known by the GRU to protect vital transfers

of both atomic and biological materials throughout the world.

 

“Upon Flight 370’s departure from Malaysia on 8 March, this report continues,

the GRU was notified by the MSS that they were going to divert it from its

scheduled destination of Beijing to Haikou Meilan International Airport (HAK)

located in Hainan Province (aka Hainan Island).

 

“Prior to this planes entering into People Liberation Army (PLA) protected zones

of the South China Sea known as the Spratly Islands, however, this report

continues, Flight 370 “significantly deviated” from its flight course and was

tracked by VKO satellites and radar flying into the Indian Ocean region and

completing its nearly 3,447 kilometer (2,142 miles) flight to Diego Garcia.

In a confirmation of the GRU’s assertion that Flight 370 was, indeed, flown to

Diego Garcia, this report says, satellite transmission data analyzed by US

investigators showed that this planes most likely last-known position was in a

zone about 1,609 kilometers (1,000 miles) west of Perth, Australia in the Indian

Ocean.

 

“Most troubling to the GRU about Flight 370’s “diversion” to Diego Garcia, this

report says, was that it was “nearly immediately” followed by some of the top

disease scientists and experts from the United States Centers for Disease

Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and

Prevention (CCDCP) embarking to Diego Garcia on at least four flights.

As to why both American and Chinese disease experts were taken to Diego Garcia

where Flight 370 is now known to be, this report says, has as yet not been

answered by either of these governments after repeated Foreign Ministry requests

for “explanations and clarification.”

 

“What is to be known, this report says, is that as Malaysia has been forced to

admit Flight 370 was, indeed, “diverted” from its flight path as the GRU had

previously reported, and as at least 25 nations are now involved in searching

for it, it remains a mystery as to what is actually occurring.

“Also known, this report concludes, is that Diego Garcia as a designated ETOPS

emergency landing site for flight planning purposes of commercial airliners

transversing the Indian Ocean, and as one of 33 emergency landing sites

worldwide for the NASA Space Shuttle, it is “inconceivable” that any type of

aircraft, let alone Flight 370, can fly anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere

without being tracked, monitored and recorded in totality.”

 

We should be aware that this is a joint Russian Chinese interpretation. Yet the

details are there and seem to be supported by the twin deaths story confirmed in

western press but accorded an un-natural but not suspicious cause. See:

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/2-ex-navy-seals-on-maersk-alabama-died-of-respiratory-failure-police-say/

 

Some might regard it as rather too convenient and inadequate for two fit men to

die simultaneously from “respiratory failure” linked to heroin abuse – a highly

unusual event. Note the familiar way in which the explanation is linked to

reputationally damaging inference – that the men were heroin abusers – a well

tried and tested ploy of the black arts. However how in their high-profile

security role this particular aspect had never been detected is not discussed.

 

The article clearly hints at either foul play or that the cargo they were

assigned to protect was either the chemical or biological cause of their demise.

IF true this appears to be shaping up to a biological warfare scenario. IF

organised by US/Israel the most likely scenario was a devastating event in the

vicinity of its destination (Beijing) blamed on Muslim terrorists probably

linked to Iran.

 

This incident appears to demonstrate features that invariably appear in “Black”

and “False Flag” Operations operations that have become a depressing feature of

particularly the last decade. An event with no obvious explanation promoted as a

“mystery” perhaps. Major confusion in its investigation blamed on extraneous

factors. An emphasis on the extent and complexity yet with relatively little to

show for it. A contradiction of information coming from different sources. An

underplaying of technological capability. Statements that are later proved must

have been knowing falsehoods designed to mislead. The creation of false trails.

The obsfutation of important facts. The introduction of deeply suspect

“eye-witness” accounts that appear designed to cast doubt on certain

individuals. The disappearing witness. Futher revelations that involve character

assassination and the creation of “patsies” to take the blame. A reluctance to

release critical information often

under the umbrella of “national security”. Attempts to control or censure

potentially “damaging” information. Hiding behind rank or organisation or

protocol. Generally secrecy and cover-up whilst claiming transparency or

justification. The careful use of semantics to subtly colour and influence

public opinion.

 

One of the features of the statement by the Malaysian Prime Minister seven days

after the event, is the emphasis on the complexity of the search operation. It

can be seen at: fahttps: //www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaOv8kpRW7wctor

 

I am not suggesting this gentleman is part of a cover-up but I would point out a

common to all known such, namely the inverse proportionality between EFFORT and

RESULTS. The principle is you have to impress with statistics – in this case the

number of ships, planes and nations involved in the search. I am sure I don’t

need to remind you of other notable examples including 9/11 and Chevaline where

we had emphasis on number of interviews, number of documents, number of

countries but significantly no DETAILS no RESULTS. In the light of subsequent

information that the plane was  tracked for many hours after its last

appearance, how can his statement be taken at face value?

 

We have already noted how the death of two men on the Maersk Alabama was handled

to deflect from the possible cause.  Then we have the fact that Maersk Alabama

was the ship on which the Oscar nominated, Hollywood film “Captain Phillips” was

based. Whether this is co-incidence or not, the ship has been used by the US

Government for delivery of medical aid to Africa and we have often seen there is

always an element of Hollywood mixed in with clandestine operations. See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maersk_Alabama_hijacking and http://www.historyvshollywood.com/reelfaces/captain-phillips.php

 

Again and again we see the line between literary creativity and practical

application fudged or replicated. It’s almost as if spooks have no imagination

of their own or need to revert to classical or fictional iconography to provide

a sort of emotional crutch. There is a two way street in America between the

creative arts and dark arts. Sometimes the former takes from the latter and vice

versa. It was a feature of Chevaline you will remember, all the main “actors”

reading from the same “script” that the scene replicated a cop show. It can be

very helpful to fudge the line between fact and fiction and to relax into the

welcoming arms of stereotypes. It saves time and convincing arguments.

 

The media manipulation sticks out like Boeing 777 – except planes since 9/11

don’t “stick out” any longer apparently!

 

In this case there was the frankly bizarre story of the two Australian/South

African/Israeli “teens” Jonti Roos and Jaan Maree, who “ONLY ON THE PREVIOUS

FLIGHT” reported on a louche, rule-breaking, security-relaxed Captain allowing

them into the “cockpit” (not “Flightdeck” you notice) for drinks  and

cigarettes, thus very conveniently demonstrating the ease with which hi-jackers

might have gained access and suggesting just a whiff of impropriety? Rather

strangely and conveniently, having appeared from nowhere and given great

prominence the girls have disappeared into media “thin air” (no pun intended!)

 

Then we have recent stories headlining all outlets, how both pilot and co-pilot

were in the frame and their houses raided. (Now what in the Chevaline story does

that remind you of?)

 

Worse was to come by association. In the Muslim context what could be worse than

associating them with homosexuals? But that is precisely what “they” have done.

Just one newspaper report will suffice although it is carried prominently by a

legion, in this case the Telegraph:

 

“Capt Zaharie was a keen supporter of Malaysia’s pro-democracy opposition party,

whose leader Anwar Ibrahim was sentenced, again, last week to five years in

prison on sodomy charges.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/malaysia/10701706/MH370-pilots-calm-last-words-said-after-plane-seized.html

 

 

This looks remarkably like intentional “fall-guy” territory to me. Someone has

to be blamed to divert attention from the true perpetrators of the crime. Again

I’m sure I don’t have to reel off  all the occasions when this ploy has been

used before in notable cases including recently in the Chevaline massacre.

 

We had a story that surfaced of two Iranian/”eastern looking” passengers with

accompanying photographs passing through customs (shades of 9/11?) who appear

now to have faded again. Ludicrously as demonstrated in another post here, the

bottom halves of the photos had inter-changeable legs!!!  In other words had

been manipulated and photo-shopped. Also the fact that false passports stolen

from Europeans were employed – a common enough practise apparently, and

particularly by a certain secret organisation.

 

Then again it has been announced from an American source that by now the plane

“is probably at the Bottom of the ocean” – another of those little semantic

indicators, a bit like “stuff happens” or “unknown unknowns”. These are

transmitted as “off the cuff” remarks when in fact they are the product of

specialists in the dark-arts of public attitude manipulation. There is no chance

that such a phrase would be used by a government spokesman without its relative

merits and connotations being pored over and agreed.

 

We are into realms of science fiction – “Forty Leagues Under the Sea” comes to

mind. Jules Verne and all that jazz. It’s often helpful to introduce science

fiction by association, or Hollywood, or television drama to blur the boundaries

between fact and fantasy. It is a corollary to the frequent and generous use of

the term “Conspiracy theory or theorist” to negate any hard scientific

proposition or objection. Just as well say the person is mentally un-balanced.

Indeed they do that as well when mere mockery fails to work.

 

The phrase also conveys the notion of finality. It is an equivalent of the

policeman on the street. “Nothing to see. Move on”. Not only is it final, there

is no chance of finding or recovering. “There will be no remnants. The

passengers are all dead so give up hope. No one is going to find it. There is no

answer. No solution. It will be a permanent mystery never resolved.” That is

what the spokesman wants us to think and if its a government spokesman it is

what the government, (the US government?) wants us to think. It also found

expression in the Chevaline case in the prosecutor’s statement right at the

beginning that the crime “would probably never be solved”.

 

Now when and if I get to that point alarm bells start to ring. The respective

government no longer becomes an innocent philanthropic partner in a search, but

a predictor of outcomes and manipulator of public attitudes as cover for much

more sinister actions and motives. State crimes either never get solved or the

wrong and innocent party gets blamed. We might call it a defining feature.

 

The fact that RR is involved, doing very nicely at the moment thank you,

complicates things. Does it play a straight bat or not. Where does BOEING stand?

Who is twisting who’s arms and what pressure is being brought to bear to toe the

line. Does Britain go along with it or call it a day of supporting big brother

Sam and little cousin Abraham particularly after the recent “very successful”

Cameron trip. And in the light of MH370 how much is Britain in the know or

implicated in the Israeli plans for Iran?

 

Meanwhile “Bluebird” blogger on Craig Murray noted this very strange

co-incidence. I quote:

 

“FAA warning 5 months ago regarding cyber hijacking of 777-200.

What a coincidence! Just another coincidence.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/11/18/2013-27343/special-conditions-boeing-model-777-200–300-and–300er-series-airplanes-aircraft-electronic-system

 

 

“On August 21, 2012, Boeing applied for permission to change the equipment to be

installed as part of an onboard data network system upgrade on the 777 series of

planes.According to information listed in the Federal Register the existing

“data network and design integration may result in security vulnerabilities from

intentional or unintentional corruption of data and systems critical to the

safety and maintenance of the airplane.”The bottom line, according to language

in the Federal Register, “The integrated network configurations in the Boeing

Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes may enable increased

connectivity with external network sources

 

“This may enable the exploitation of network security vulnerabilities and

increased risks potentially resulting in unsafe conditions for the airplanes and

occupants.”

 

“ADB-S and ACAR are among systems on the plane that authorities have

acknowledged were possibly compromised in some way.”

 

As always we are at the mercy of governments and news agencies. The trouble is,

experience has taught us we can trust neither. MH 370 appears to be but the

latest manifestation of that phenomenon in which only and always the innocent

suffer and the shadowy figures behind it don’t care.END

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share on Facebook
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Flight MH 370: Is there a sinister link with “Captain Phillips” “Maersk Alabama”? – Tim Veater

  1. Tim Veater says:

    “Trident has—and has always had—a zero-tolerance policy with respect to
    controlled substances. Likewise, Trident subcontractors agree to consume no
    alcohol from the time they depart their home of record until they return to their
    home of record – even if they remain in the area of operations to cross-deck to
    another vessel.”

    “Indeed, Trident meets or exceeds every standard Mr. Luhta appears to advocate – and has
    done so consistently for nearly fifteen years. If Trident really was part of an industry run amok,
    as Lutha suggests, then why do its clients warrant the maximum discount from K&R providers?
    The tragic loss of two Trident subcontractors – men who were our colleagues, shipmates,
    and friends – under as-yet unexplained circumstances – is a cause for grief and introspection. It
    is not an opportunity to fire a broadside against an entire industry. Trident Group has and
    continues to engage in constructive and productive dialogue with industry stakeholders to
    educate, inform, and develop solutions that better serve the shipping industry and
    management’s commitment to protecting seafarers.”
    http://www.gotridentgroup.com/

  2. Tim Veater says:

    Perhaps I should clarify that the time given for the last communication with the plane’s co-pilot was given (with minor variation) as 1.21 am local time following which it is claimed both radio and transponder were “turned off” manually. Subsequently it was confirmed that the plane continued an automated contact with satellite for a “further seven and a half hours” although this does not correspond with the Prime Minister’s last time of eight twenty one am. As far as I am aware, precise details of the military radar tracking nor the Boeing/Rolls Royce systems tracking have been given which is strange as this should have given definitive information on all the critical avionics and destination. That this has not been revealed is rather suspicious to say the least. END.

  3. Tim Veater says:

    Just three other observations: We are told that a full 7.5 hours after the alleged “disappearance” the aircraft was still “pinging” to satellite receptor presumably because it is not, as an American government spokesman claimed “probably at the bottom of the ocean”.

    Wikipedia has this: “The Boeing 777 is Boeing’s first “fly-by-wire” airliner, with “computer-mediated controls” as part of the first entirely computer-designed commercial aircraft. It has a range of 5,235 to 9,380 nautical miles and the 777-200LR is the world’s longest-range airliner and can fly more than halfway around the globe; it holds the record for the longest distance flown non-stop by a commercial aircraft. It has a typical cruising speed of Mach 0.84 (560 mph, 905 km/h, 490 knots) at a cruise altitude of 35,000 ft (11,000 m).”

    Using these figures it is fairly easy to calculate that potentially the aircraft could have travelled up to around 4,100 miles (7.5 x 560) from its point of “disappearance” in the time available. That allows for a wide range of geographical locations.

    A further issue never addressed is why, once it was clear that the aircraft had gone “off-line” in both senses, standard protocol was not followed and the plane intercepted by military aircraft? After all the terrorist possibilities of hi-jacked commercial planes are now well understood world-wide.

    These are suspicious aspects to this story.END.

  4. Lenggang Kangkung says:

    Israel closes embassies all over the world before MH370 gone missing ? – http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/03/red-alert-possible-use-for-flight-370-found-2924592.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 × three =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>