MP’s Discuss Bilderberg in the House of Commons
What I found noticeable when Clarke gave list of attendee types that he omitted to mention bankers – do they, in smoke filled rooms, agree such things as lowering interest rates (towards zero as they have done) in order to help transfer people’s savings to banks (as they have done) that would, and should, otherwise have been allowed to go to the wall? .
Clarke may well claim that Bilderberg is a talking shop, but we know that the EEC was first mooted at Bilderberg and it came about the following year. We also see laws being passed in different countries around the world that seem to have a common provenance.
And several Bilderberg attendees have gone on, soon after, to become presidents and prime ministers.
Unfortunately, those in Parliament did not ask the right questions – some because they didn’t want to and others because they didn’t have a sufficient knowledge.
Clarke is master of disinformation, but he did say that there was an agenda that is supposed to be in the public domain – I wonder whether the recordings of the meeting could be made public (if you look at pictures of first meeting in 1954, you will see the banks of tape machines through the windows to a ancillary room).
Also the media should be held to account as to why they do not report the meetings – after all if it’s only a talking shop then they have nothing to hide or fear, have they/
Anyone care to take this up with Ed Balls, Clarke, Osborne etc?
I believe my MP and PM, David Cameron attended Watford to give an address, if anyone has confirmation of this, I might just write him a letter.
Finally, you noticed how Michael Meacher was deliberately made by the cabal of establishment MPs (from both sides) to look foolish and how the whole thing was treated as a huge joke - what they are really doing with their frivolity is taking the piss out of the general public who pay the bills.